Michelle Rhee is in trouble

michelle rheefavicon There hasn’t been an indictment, and there isn’t any hard evidence yet, but Michelle Rhee may soon find herself in the middle of a major cheating scandal.

StudentsFirst founder and former chancellor of the Washington D.C. public schools, Ms. Rhee is known for her tough-love, results-only, no-excuses approach to educational reform. She’s been on the cover of Time magazine and is the author of Radical: Fighting to Put Students First. Ms. Rhee is hugely famous — and contentious, and controversial.

And today, in a scathing article by respected education reporter John Merrow, Ms. Rhee is being accused of knowing about a large-scale cheating scandal and not doing enough to investigate it.

In “Michelle Rhee’s Reign of Error,” Mr. Merrow discusses a leaked confidential memorandum he received written by an independent investigator. The report first highlights wrong-to-right erasure data from one school in the district. Whereas the average student had 1.7 wrong-to-right erasures on the reading test, students from Aiton Elementary School had 5.7 erasures. An article last year in the USA Today, which first uncovered the wrong-to-right phenomenon, indicated that the chances of such a discrepancy in erasures are “greater than the odds of winning the Powerball.” After focusing on Aiton, the memo added, “Aiton is NOT the only school in this situation.”

There’s something going on here. I’m usually skeptical about conspiracy theories, and I know that there are plenty of people out there that would do anything to bring Ms. Rhee down. But the combination of the USA Today article and Mr. Merrow’s post is pretty damning.

Here’s what hit me most: Mr. Merrow implicates not only Ms. Rhee but the entire results-only movement in hurting children. The usual argument is that No Child Left Behind has made school boring and pressure-packed. It goes something like, There’s no more time for art or independent reading. Everything is geared toward the test. There’s no joy anymore.

That assertion may be true. But Mr. Merrow concludes his article with something even more troubling. Ms. Rhee, in her crusade to put students first, actually created an environment that centered on adults. After all, during her tenure, millions of dollars of bonuses went to teachers and principals whose students performed well.

Success meant more money for the adults, not the children. In fact, children who falsely improved were taken out of intervention programs they’d qualified for based on their previous (and accurate) test scores. Yes, according to Mr. Merrow, students were directly cheated.

Georgia Governor Nathan Deal nailed it:

“When test results are falsified and students who have not mastered the necessary material are promoted, our students are harmed, parents lose sight of their child’s true progress, and taxpayers are cheated.”

I want to believe in education reform, and I gravitate toward people who work hard and are unabashed in their passion toward success. We cannot accept mediocrity. But as more and more evidence piles up against Ms. Rhee, I can no longer pretend that something quite sinister did not occur in Washington D.C. under her leadership.

Update, April 16: As I expected, this story is now being picked up by major media outlets. Here are a few articles to check out:

I welcome your thoughts! favicon

Not reading the book? The book is watching you.

favicon One of the biggest challenges for English teachers is figuring out whether students have done the reading. Some assign reading questions, which can be copied. Others give pop quizzes, whose questions sometimes get nit-picky. Still others assess through classroom discussion, which often lead to deep discussions unrelated to the text.

Wouldn’t it be great, many teachers say, if we could just find out if students are reading?

That is now possible, according to an article from today’s New York Times, “Teacher Knows If You’ve Done the E-Reading.” (You can check it out at Iserotope Extras!) Reporter David Streitfeld writes about new technology from CourseSmart, an etextbook company, that tracks students’ reading and notetaking in books.

It’s pretty intense.

I’m a fan of “social reading,” a newish phenomenon where students and the teacher interact inside a shared ebook. If one student highlights and annotates a specific passage, then his classmates can see it and build on it. It’s like having a virtual book club. It builds the social aspect of reading and encourages students to see reading as a conversation.

A few teachers use Amazon’s Public Notes feature (though it’s not very good yet) if they have Kindles. A few companies — like Subtext and Gobstopper — are also working on social reading and offering ways for students to demonstrate their reading directly in the text. A student’s highlights and annotations can serve as formative assessment.

Going into reading the article, I thought I was going to be a big proponent. But then I read that CourseSmart is owned by Pearson, a crazy huge conglomerate. Then came this part:

Students do not see their engagement indexes unless a professor shows them, but they know the books are watching them.

In other words, the professor knows if the student is reading (according to a computer-generated “engagement index”), but there’s no expectation to share that data with the student.

This is, of course, completely and utterly wrong.

The point of technology is to increase human communication, to extend learning past the confines of the classroom, to promote collaboration. Unfortunately, what’s happening here reminds me a bit of Big Brother. (I know that term is used a lot, but really, I think it fits here.) In fact, a Texas A&M administrator said the same thing:

“It’s Big Brother, sort of, but with a good intent,” said Tracy Hurley, the dean of the school of business.

By no means am I trying to be a Luddite. As you know (from my fascination with Google Apps and SmashText and Pocket and many other online services), I believe technology can enhance teaching and learning. But CourseSmart raises my hackles like Google Glass — where the information is not shared with everyone, where it’s hidden from people at the expense of others.

Please let me know what you think! Am I crazy here? favicon

Another reason that college is crucial for all students

favicon College is expensive, and there’s no guarantee that you’ll get a job after graduating. Those facts together have led some teachers to question the value of college for all students.

Of course, it’s also true that the same teachers who are challenging college did, in fact, earn a college degree and are reaping the rewards of a college education.

And likely advocate college for their own children.

But in case there’s any doubt, check out this unemployment rate graph from Business Insider:

Blue = Unemployment rate of high school graduates
Red = Unemployment rate of college graduates & higher

unemployment rate

(Um, 2008 was not a good year.)

So in addition to all the other reasons all students should go to college, not being unemployed is pretty high up the list. If I read the graph correctly, the unemployment rate among high school graduates is double that of college graduates. (I wonder what happens if you don’t graduate from high school.)

For another sobering article about college, check out Iserotope Extrasfavicon

On the go? Save Iserotope articles to your Pocket

pocketfavicon If you’re a loyal Iserotope reader, you’re serious. You don’t want to miss any articles.

You likely follow Iserotope via Facebook or Twitter or Google+ or RSS feed or Instagram or email.

That’s great. But what if you find yourself in the middle of an article and don’t have time to finish? Or what if you want to save an article for later?

Most people email articles to themselves, and that’s OK. Perfectly great, good work.

But I have something better: Pocket.

Pocket is my favorite save-it-for-later service (even more than my previous favorite, Readability). You can save articles, videos, and images and read them later on your computer, tablet, or computer.

New to Iserotope: At the end of every post, you’ll see that there is a Pocket button. Try it out. You won’t be disappointed. And while you’re there, you might as well share the post with your friends, right?

Is there anyone out there who already uses Pocket? If so, let me know! favicon

Follow Iserotope on Instagram!

instagram-logofavicon There’s never a dull moment at Iserotope.

Today, for all of you Instagram lovers out there, I announce that you can now follow Iserotope on Instagram.

You can follow Iserotope right now, right from your computer. Just click on this link or on the “View on Instagram” button on the ride sidebar.

It’s all very exciting.

If you go to my profile, you’ll see photos dedicated to reading, teaching, and technology, plus maybe a few that are off-topic.

Important: If you want to find Iserotope on your phone, it gets a little trickier. My username on Instagram is iseroma, not iserotope. But you’re all smart people.

* * *
With this new Instagram news, there are at least six ways to connect with Iserotope to ensure that you don’t miss a thing: FacebookTwitterGoogle+RSS FeedInstagram, and Via email (enter your email address on the right sidebar).

I hope you enjoy the new Iserotope feature, and please let me know your thoughts and suggestions. favicon